Yes at first glance, but there are major disadvantages with the standard designs and a certain degree of operational uncertainty.
In some applications this can be unproblematic, but if a longer service life due to less wear, smoother running, improved guidance and the operational reliability of the system are important, then the use of easy drive® always has a clear advantage.
In the standard versions, the timing belt runs between the flanged pulleys and can run heavily against them. If a flanged pulley is pushed away by the lateral forces, the timing belt runs off the pulley easily and the entire system comes to an undesired standstill.
The constant striping/running of the timing belt on the flanged pulley leads to wear and the timing belt is rubbed off laterally. This leads to the tension cord in the timing belt escaping and can lead to increased wear with damage, up to and including failure of the complete system.
The timing belt cannot be positively guided between the flanged pulleys and requires a lateral play of 2-3 mm in the run. The timing belt can therefore oscillate strongly between the flanged pulleys on the toothed pulley, especially in the case of revers running, i.e. it cannot run precisely.
This leads to positioning errors in the case of conveyor timing belts, to uneven running in the case of drive belts, and to higher axial forces on the bearings in all applications.
The easy drive® system eliminates all these disadvantages:
The belt therefore runs backlash-free and precisely, cannot be rubbed off sideways, positions precisely and is therefore more accurate for the entire system and the entire plant, almost wear-free and thus significantly more durable.
Higher costs for the initial use respectively the conversion to easy drive® are almost completely compensated or even more profitable, and lead to high customer satisfaction and safety in use in addition to the precise, long service life.